中小企业为我国经济社会发展做出了突出贡献,但却长期面临融资难题。为评估货币政策破解中小企业融资难题的效果,本文构建包含异质性企业的DSGE模型,创新性地将总量货币政策和结构性货币政策纳入统一的政策调控框架。结果发现:总量货币政策与结构性货币政策均能刺激经济,降息使通货膨胀大幅提升,降准释放的资金多数流入大型企业;但以定向降准和再贷款为例的结构性货币政策可以精准引导商业银行定向增加中小企业信贷投放,缓解中小企业的融资困境。“总量货币政策+ 结构性货币政策”通过稳住中小企业,平抑了供给冲击和需求冲击对宏观经济造成的波动,增强了经济稳定性,提高了社会福利。本文研究表明,短期可以通过货币政策协调补齐资源配置短板,长期必须深化改革建立市场化的金融体制,才能从根本上解决我国中小企业融资难题,实现经济高质量发展。
Abstract
Since the adoption of the“reform and opening-up”policy, the private economy with small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs) has achieved great development. It has played an important role in stabilizing growth, promoting innovation, increasing employment and improving people's livelihood. It is also an important force driving China's economic and social devel-opment. However, due to the preferences of financial institutions and favorable policies towards state-owned enterprises, SMEs are suffering from financing disadvantage in credit market and facing the dilemma of financing difficulties and financing expense.
In the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model which includes heterogeneous enterprises, this paper incorporates aggregate monetary policy and structural monetary policy into a unified monetary policy framework, quantitatively analyzes the short-term and long-term effects of two types of monetary policies, and evaluates the effects of monetary policies on solving the financing problems of SMEs as well as the impacts on macro-economic stability.
The results shows that both aggregate monetary policy and structural monetary policy can stimulate the economy. From the short-term perspective,decreasing interest rate will lead to a sharp rise in inflation and the funds released by lower required reserve ratios will flow to large enterprises. The structural monetary policy, with the example of targeted cuts of required reserve ratios and re-lending,can guide the orderly flow of funds to SMEs and ease the financing difficulties of SMEs. From the long-term perspective, when the economy suffers from supply and demand shocks, structural monetary policy can coordinate with aggregate monetary poli-cy to increase the credit ratio of SMEs, reduce economic fluctuations, and thus improving economic stability and social welfare.
This paper suggests that efforts should be made to coordinate different types of monetary policies to improve resource allocation efficiency in short run, and deepen economic reforms to establish a market-oriented financial system in the long run, with the aim to finally resolving the financing problems of SMEs in China and achieve higher quality economic development.
关键词
中小企业 /
总量货币政策 /
结构性货币政策 /
宏观经济稳定
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) /
Aggregate Monetary Policy /
Structural Monetary Policy /
Macroeconomic Stability
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号:
F822
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈小亮,马啸.“债务—通缩”风险与货币政策财政政策协调[J]. 经济研究,2016 (8):28-42
[2] 冯明,伍戈. 定向降准政策的结构性效果研究———基于两部门异质性商业银行模型的理论分析[J]. 财贸经济,2018 (12):62-79
[3] 李广子,熊德华,刘力. 中小银行发展如何影响中小企业融资?———兼析产生影响的多重中介效应[J]. 金融研究,2016 (12):78-94
[4] 李建强,高宏. 结构性货币政策能降低中小企业融资约束吗?———基于异质性动态随机一般均衡模型的分析[J]. 经济科学,2019 (6):17-29
[5] 林仁文,杨熠. 中国市场化改革与货币政策有效性演变———基于 DSGE 的模型分析[J]. 管理世界,2014 (6):39-52
[6] 林毅夫,李永军. 中小金融机构发展与中小企业融资[J]. 经济研究,2001(1):10-58
[7] 刘畅,刘冲,马光荣. 中小金融机构与中小企业贷款[J]. 经济研究,2017(8):65-77
[8] 刘伟,苏剑.“新常态”下的中国宏观调控[J]. 经济科学,2014 (4):5-13
[9] 潘彬,金雯雯. 货币政策对民间借贷利率的作用机制与实施效果[J]. 经济研究,2017(8):78-93
[10] 潘敏,周闯. 宏观审慎监管、房地产市场调控和金融稳定———基于贷款价值比的 DSGE 模型分析[J]. 国际金融研究,2019 (4):14-23
[11] 彭俞超,方意. 结构性货币政策、产业结构升级与经济稳定[J]. 经济研究,2016 (7):29-42
[12] 钱雪松,杜立,马文涛. 中国货币政策利率传导有效性研究:中介效应和体制内外差异[J]. 管理世界,2015 (11):11-28
[13] 孙大超,王博,Wang Gang.银行业垄断是导致货币政策抑制中小企业的-因吗[J]. 金融研究,2014(6):99-114
[14] 万冲,朱红. 中国结构性货币政策的效果评估及优化思路[J]. 学术论坛,2017 (4):83-91
[15] 王遥,潘冬阳,彭俞超,梁希. 基于DSGE 模型的绿色信贷激励政策研究[J]. 金融研究,2019 (11):1-18
[16] 肖争艳,陈惟. 货币政策、利率传导与中小企业融资成本———基于实际融资成本的实证研究[J]. 经济评论,2017 (5):79-90
[17] 杨咸月. 大、中、小企业货币紧缩效应及其差异研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2014 (10):3-20
[18] 尹志超,钱龙,吴雨. 银企关系、银行业竞争与中小企业借贷成本[J]. 金融研究,2015 (1):134-149
[19] 张都兴,张兆杰. 中小企业为什么融资难?———一个非信息经济学的解释[J]. 国际金融研究,2001 (6):43-46
[20] 张晓晶,刘学良,王佳. 债务高企、风险集聚与体制变革———对发展型政府的反思与超越[J]. 经济研究,2019 (6):4-21
[21] Bernanke B S,Gertler M,Gilchrist S.The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework[M].
Handbook of Macroeconomics,Elsevier Science,1999:1341-1393
[22] Chang C,Liu Z,Spiegel M,Zhang J.Reserve Requirement and Optimal Chinese Stabilization Policy[J]. Journal
of Monetary Economics,2019,103:33-51
[23] ChristianoL,Motto R,Rostagno M. Risk Shocks[J]. American Economic Review,2014,104(1):27-65
[24] Gambacorta L,Signoretti F M.Should Monetary Policy Lean Against the Wind?An Analysis Based on a DSGE
Model with Banking[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamic & Control,2014 (43):146-174
[25] Hsieh C T,Klenow P J.Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009,124(4):1403-1148
[26] Rotemberg J.Sticky Prices in the United States[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1982,90(6):1187-1211
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
*本文获国家自然科学基金项目“企业债务与宏观经济稳定:基于异质性企业动态行为模型的实证研究和政策分析”(71873087)、上海财经大学研究生创新基金项目“企业债务、金融摩擦与宏观经济波动”(CXJJ-2018-353)、上海财经大学经济学院科研创新项目“破解中小企业融资难题的货币政策选择和宏观经济稳定”(CXJJ-2020-25)资助
{{custom_fund}}