本文构建由金融发展、资本开放、汇率制度与产出增长组成的理论模型,选取世界上118个经济体1972—2016 年的宏观数据,综合运用动态面板、面板门槛与面板IV模型进行实证分析。本文得出主要结论为：第一,在汇率制度弹性对长期经济增长的边际影响中,金融发展水平呈显著为正的调节效应;第二,对于金融发展水平较高的国家,汇率制度弹性在资本项目开放度与长期经济增长之间存在显著正向的调节效应;第三,在金融发展水平较高时,对外贸易开放度在汇率制度弹性与长期经济增长之间存在显著为正的中介效应。借鉴历史发展经验,本文归纳出“先发展国内金融市场,再开放浮动汇率,最后加强资本开放”的汇改最优次序,为我国克服汇率制度改革难点、推进资本项目开放、维持经济基本面稳定增长提出合理化政策建议。
Abstract
At present, there are many difficulties in the reform of China's exchange rate system. Based on the early development experience of some countries in the world, if the exchange rate fluctuates excessively, it may reduce the cash value of enterprises, hinder the industrial upgrading, and affect the growth of economic fundamentals. With the premise of maintaining the growth trend of economic fundamentals, when can China fully liberalize the floating exchange rate system? What is the priority of opening floating exchange rate system and opening capital account? All these are the important issues that need to be solved in the process of exchange rate system reform.
In order to answer these questions, this paper constructs a theoretical model composed of financial development, capital opening, exchange rate system and output growth, selects the macro data of 118 economies in the world from 1972 to 2016, uses the dynamic panel, panel threshold and panel IV model to analyze the moderator role of financial development level between exchange rate system flexibility and long-term economic growth, and carries on further analysis.
The main conclusions are as followed. Firstly, in the marginal effect from exchange rate regime elasticity to long-term economic growth, the level of financial development shows a significant positive regulatory effect; Secondly, for countries with higher level of financial development, the elasticity of exchange rate regime has a significant positive regulatory effect between capital openness and long-term economic growth; Thirdly, when the level of financial development is high, it has a significant positive regulatory effect on long-term economic growth. Foreign trade openness has a significant positive mediating effect between exchange rate system elasticity and long-term economic growth.
According to the above conclusions, this paper sums up the priorities of exchange rate system reform as “developing financial market first, opening floating exchange rate regime second, and strengthening capital openness eventually”, which provides reasonable policy suggestions for China to overcome the difficulties of exchange rate regime reform, promote capital account opening, and maintain stable growth of economic fundamentals.
关键词
金融发展 /
汇率制度 /
经济增长 /
动态面板 /
调节效应
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Financial Development /
Exchange Rate Regime /
Economic Growth /
Dynamic Panel /
Regulatory Effect
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号：
F831
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈金至,尹依依,钱程. 汇率制度与收入不平等——基于跨国面板数据的研究[J]. 国际金融研究,2017(8):43-53
[2] 崔小勇,张鹏杨,张晓芳. 汇率制度转型的贸易和收入效应[J]. 金融研究,2016(9):67-81
[3] 戴金平,黎艳,刘东坡. 汇率波动对世界经济的影响[J]. 国际金融研究,2017(5):46-55
[4] 丁志杰,谢峰. 汇率对中等收入国家经济跨越的影响研究[J]. 金融研究,2017(2):42-53
[5] 李芳,卢璐,卢逸扬. 资本流动突然中断、汇率制度与经济增长[J]. 财贸经济,2018(2):69-85
[6] 李丽玲,王曦. 资本账户开放、汇率波动与经济增长:国际经验与启示[J]. 国际金融研究,2016(11):24-35
[7] 刘程,佟家栋. 新兴市场的汇率制度选择、金融约束与经济增长[J]. 南开经济研究,2010(5):3-17
[8] 马宇,安晓庆. 汇率变动、收入差距与经济增长——基于不同经济发展阶段的实证研究[J]. 经济学家,2018(9):78-87
[9] 唐琳,谈正达,胡海鸥. 基于MS-VAR 的“三元悖论”约束及对经济影响研究[J]. 国际金融研究,2015
(9):35-44
[10] 余永定,肖立晟. 论人民币汇率形成机制改革的推进方向[J]. 国际金融研究,2016(11):3-13
[11] Aghion P,Bacchetta P,Ranciere R,et al.Exchange Rate Volatility and Productivity Growth:The Role of Financial Development[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2009,56(4):494-513
[12] Chinn M D,Ito H.What Matters for Financial Development:Capital Controls,Institutions,and Interactions[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2006,81(1):163-192
[13] De Grauwe P,Schnabl G. Exchange Rate Stability,Inflation,and Growth in (South) Eastern and Central Europe[J]. Review of Development Economics,2008,12(3):530-549
[14] Feenstra R C,Inklaar R,Timmer M P.The Next Generation of the Penn World Table[J]. American Economic Review,2015,105(10):3150-82
[15] Fraj S H,Hamdaoui M,Maktouf S.Governance and Economic Growth:The Role of the Exchange Rate Regime[J]. International Economics,2018:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.05.003
[16] Husain A M,Mody A,Rogoff K S.Exchange Rate Regime Durability and Performance in Developing Versus Advanced Economies[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2005,52(1):35-64
[17] Ilzetzki E,ReinhartC M,Rogoff K S. Exchange Arrangements Entering the 21st Century:Which AnchorWill Hold?[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research,2017
[18] Kassa,Woubet,Emmanuel L. Financial Development,Exchange Rate Regimes,and Growth Dynamics[R]. The World Bank,2018:No. 8562
[19] Laeven M L,Valencia M F.Systemic Banking Crises Revisited[M]. International Monetary Fund,2018
[20] Morales-Zumaquero A,Sosvilla-Rivero S.A Contribution to the Empirics of Convergence in Real GDP Growth:The Role of Financial Crises and Exchange-Rate Regimes[J]. Applied Economics,2016,48(23):2156-2169
[21] Rodriguez C M.The Growth Effects of Financial Openness and Exchange Rates[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance,2017(48):492-512
[22] Rodrik D.The Real Exchange Rate and Economic Growth[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,2008(2):365-412
[23] Schnabl G.Exchange Rate Volatility and Growth in Small Open Economies at the EMU Periphery[J]. Economic Systems,2008,32(1):70-91
[24] Vieira F V,MacDonald R. A Panel Data Investigation of Real Exchange Rate Misalignment and Growth[J]. Estudos Econômicos,2012,42(3):433-456
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
*本文获国家社会科学基金重点项目“新常态下我国影子银行体系的风险溢出效应及其对货币政策的影响研究”（15AJY021）资助
{{custom_fund}}
京公网安备 11010202008337号
