Stimulating the consumption potential of residents and promoting consumption upgrading have become the key to transforming the mode of economic growth and promoting the high-quality development of economy.
Based on the digital inclusive financial index of the Peking University, this paper explores the mechanism of the impact of digital finance on the consumption and consumption upgrading of Chinese residents. The research has the following findings. Firstly, generally speaking, digital finance together with its three dimensions, namely breadth of coverage, depth of usage and degree of digitalization, have significantly improved the overall consumption level of residents and promoted consumption upgrading. Secondly, in the urban-rural test, digital finance not only improves the consumption level of urban and rural residents, but also promotes the consumption upgrading of urban residents. However, the empirical result also shows that digital finance has no significant effect on the consumption upgrading of rural residents. Thirdly, in the regional test, digital finance plays a significant role in promoting the consumer upgrading in the eastern and central regions, but not in the western regions.
According to the research conclusions, this paper suggests that, firstly, the government and communication enterprises should speed up the construction of 5G and other high -speed networks, especially strengthen the infrastructure network construction in Western and rural areas. Secondly, financial institutions and large Internet financial companies should continue to develop information terminals and mobile Internet application software(App) suitable to the characteristics of digital finance, so as to increase the stickiness of customers in using digital finance. Thirdly, we should strengthen the education and popularization of digital finance knowledge among rural residents, improve their financial literacy and acceptance of digital finance, take multiple measures to promote the economic development level of the western region.
Key words
Digital Finance /
Breadth of Coverage /
Depth of Usage /
Degree of Digitalization /
Consumption Upgrading
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 杜传忠,张远.“新基建”背景下数字金融的区域创新效应[J]. 财经科学,2020 (5):30-42
[2] 方娴,金刚. 社会学习与消费升级———来自中国电影市场的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济,2020 (1):43-61
[3] 付争,王皓. 竞争还是竞合:数字金融赋能下金融包容与银行体系发展[J]. 国际金融研究,2021 (1):65-75
[4] 郭峰,王靖一,王芳,孔涛,张勋,程志云.测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征[J]. 经济学(季刊),2020,19(4):1401-1418
[5] 郭峰,王瑶佩. 传统金融基础、知识门槛与数字金融下乡[J]. 财经研究,2020,46(1):19-33
[6] 郭英之,李小民. 消费者使用移动支付购买旅游产品意愿的实证研究———基于技术接受模型与计划行为理论模型[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018 (6):159-170
[7] 黄益平,黄卓. 中国的数字金融发展:现在与未来[J]. 经济学(季刊),2018,17(4):1489-1502
[8] 江嘉骏,刘玉珍,陈康. 移动互联网是否带来行为偏误———来自网络借贷市场的新证据[J]. 经济研究,2020,55(6):39-55
[9] 雷潇雨,龚六堂. 城镇化对于居民消费率的影响:理论模型与实证分析[J]. 经济研究,2014,49(6):44-57
[10] 李傲,杨志勇,赵元凤. 精准扶贫视角下医疗保险对农牧户家庭消费的影响研究———基于内蒙古自治区730 份农牧户的问卷调查数据[J]. 中国农村经济,2020 (2):118-133
[11] 李波. 中国城镇家庭金融风险资产配置对消费支出的影响———基于微观调查数据 CHFS 的实证分析[J]. 国际金融研究,2015(1):83-92
[12] 李江一,李涵. 消费信贷如何影响家庭消费?[J]. 经济评论,2017 (2):113-126
[13] 冉光和,蓝震森,李晓龙. 农村金融服务、农民收入水平与农村可持续消费[J]. 管理世界,2016 (10):176-177
[14] 唐琦,夏庆杰,李实. 中国城市居民家庭的消费结构分析:1995—2013[J]. 经济研究,2018,53(2):35-49
[15] 王勇. 通过发展消费金融扩大居民消费需求[J]. 经济学动态,2012 (8):75-78
[16] 邢天才,张夕. 互联网消费金融对城镇居民消费升级与消费倾向变动的影响[J]. 当代经济研究,2019 (5):89-97+113
[17] 杨伟明,粟麟,王明伟. 数字普惠金融与城乡居民收入———基于经济增长与创业行为的中介效应分析[J]. 上海财经大学学报,2020,22(4):83-94
[18] 易行健,周利. 数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费———来自中国家庭的微观证据[J]. 金融研究,2018 (11):47-67
[19] 赵保国,盖念. 互联网消费金融对国内居民消费结构的影响———基于 VAR 模型的实证研究[J]. 中央财经大学学报,2020 (3):33-43
[20] 周建,艾春荣,王丹枫,唐莹. 中国农村消费与收入的结构效应[J]. 经济研究,2013,48(2):122-133
{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}
Footnotes
{{custom_fn.content}}