碳交易市场稳定和高效运行是中国实现“碳达峰”和“碳中和”的重要支撑。本文通过构建指标体系,对中国碳交易市场运行效率和市场风险水平进行定量测算,并进行国际比较分析。本文分析结果表明:第一,在运行效率方面,国内碳排放配额发放以免费分配为主,企业参与碳交易以清缴履约为主要目的,市场资源配置功能尚未充分发挥,国内碳交易市场总体上处于弱式有效或无效状态,市场定价效率有待进一步提高;第二,在风险水平方面,受供需结构间歇性失调影响,中国碳价波动较国际成熟市场更大,区域之间呈现较为明显的异质性,且由于缺乏衍生品交易机制,中国碳交易市场风险管理体系仍不完善。在上述分析基础上,本文就如何提高中国碳交易市场效率和风险管理水平提出政策建议。
Abstract
International experience has demonstrated that the stable and highly efficient operation of the carbon trading market plays a vital role in achieving the carbon emission reduction target. It is expected that the efficient operation of the carbon trading market will contribute to China's efforts in “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality” objectives. However, China's carbon trading market, particularly the quota trading market, still lacks a comprehensive institutional and mechanistic framework compared to that of developed countries and regions. Consequently, there is a need to address various circumstances and issues to strengthen its functioning.
By constructing an indicator system, this paper quantitatively calculates the operation efficiency and risk level of China's carbon trading market, and conducts international comparative analysis on this basis. The results show that: in terms of operation efficiency, the current issuance of domestic carbon emission quotas in China is primarily based on free allocation. Enterprises mainly participate in the market to fulfill payment and performance obligations. Therefore, the resource allocation function of the market has not yet been fully utilized. Meanwhile, China's carbon trading markets are generally weakly efficient or ineffective, indicating the need for further improvement of the market pricing efficiency. In terms of market risk, affected by intermittent imbalance of supply and demand structure, China's carbon trading price fluctuates more than overseas mature markets, and there is obvious heterogeneity between and among regions. Due to the absence of derivatives trading mechanism, the risk management system of China's carbon trading market remains incomplete.
This paper contributes to existing theoretical literature and provides valuable insights by quantitatively evaluating the development of China's carbon trading market and the regional heterogeneity. Furthermore, through a comprehensive and objective comparison of domestic and overseas markets from multiple dimensions, this paper sheds lights on the disparities and factors which influence the development of carbon trading markets. The policy recommendations proposed on this basis have certain reference value for understanding the development of China's carbon trading market.
关键词
碳交易 /
碳减排 /
碳达峰 /
碳中和
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Carbon Trading /
Carbon Emission Reduction /
Carbon Peaking /
Carbon Neutrality
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号:
F821
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 柴尚蕾,周鹏. 基于非参数Copula-CVaR模型的碳金融市场集成风险测度[J]. 中国管理科学,2019(8):1-13
[2] 陈智颖,许林,钱崇秀. 中国碳金融发展水平测度及其动态演化[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2020(8):62-82
[3] 杜莉,张云. 我国碳排放总量控制交易的分配机制设计——基于欧盟排放交易体系的经验[J]. 国际金融研究,2013(7):51-58
[4] 樊智,张世英. 金融市场的效率与分形市场理论[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2002(3):13-19
[5] 蒋晶晶,叶斌,马晓明. 基于GARCH-EVT-VaR模型的碳市场风险计量实证研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2015(3):511-517
[6] 齐绍洲,张振源. 碳金融对可再生能源技术创新的异质性影响——基于欧盟碳市场的实证研究[J]. 国际金融研究,2019(5):13-23
[7] 王定祥,琚丽娟. 碳金融的概念及属性[J]. 经济研究参考,2013(24):19-21
[8] 王婷婷,张亚利,王淼晗. 中国碳金融市场风险度量研究[J]. 金融论坛,2016(9):57-68
[9] 王扬雷,杜莉. 我国碳金融交易市场的有效性研究——基于北京碳交易市场的分形理论分析[J]. 管理世界,2015(12):174-175
[10] 王影,张远晴,董锋. 中国碳市场风险测度[J]. 环境经济研究,2020,5(4):30-53
[11] 杨超,李国良,门明. 国际碳交易市场的风险度量及对我国的启示——基于状态转移与极值理论的VaR比较研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2011(4):94-109
[12] 杨胜刚,卢向前. 噪声交易、H指数与中国外汇市场效率研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2003(2):27-31
[13] 易兰,李朝鹏,杨历,刘杰. 中国7大碳交易试点发育度对比研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2018(2):134-140
[14] 俞红海,徐龙炳,陈百助. 终极控股股东控制权与自由现金流过度投资[J]. 经济研究,2010(8):103-114
[15] 张晨,杨玉,张涛. 基于Copula模型的商业银行碳金融市场风险整合度量[J]. 中国管理科学,2015(4):61-69
[16] 张小艳,张宗成. 期货市场有效性理论与实证检验[J]. 中国管理科学,2005(6):1-5
[17] 张小艳,张宗成. 关于我国期货市场弱式有效性的研究[J]. 管理工程学报,2007(1):145-147
[18] 赵云辉,张哲,冯泰文,陶克涛. 大数据发展、制度环境与政府治理效率[J]. 管理世界,2019(11):119-132
[19] Alberto M,Frans P D.Carbon Trading Thickness and Market Efficiency[J]. Energy Economics,2010,32(6):1331-1336
[20] Betz R,Seifert S,Cramton P,Kerr S.Auctioning Greenhouse Gas Emissions Permits in Australia[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2010,54(2):219-238
[21] Blyth W,Bunn D.Coevolution of Policy,Market and Technical Price Risks in the EU ETS[J]. Energy Policy,2011,39(8):4578-4593
[22] Bredin D,Hyde S,Muckley C.A Microstructure Analysis of the Carbon Finance Market[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis,2014,34:222-234
[23] Campbell J Y,Lo A W,MacKinlay A C. The Econometrics of Financial Markets[M]. Princeton University Press,New Jersey,1997
[24] Cramton P,Kerr S.Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions:How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather[J]. Energy policy,2002,30(4):333-345
[25] Dutschke M,Schlamadinger B,Wong J L P,Rumberg M. Value and Risks of Expiring Carbon Credits from Afforestation and Reforestation Projects under the CDM[J]. Climate Policy,2005,5(1):109-125
[26] Ehrhart K M,Hoppe C,Schleich J,Seifert S.The Role of Auctions and Forward Markets in the EU ETS:Counterbalancing the Cost-Inefficiencies of Combining Generous Allocation with a Ban on Banking[J]. Climate Policy,Routledge,2005(5):31-46
[27] Goeree J K,Palmer K,Holt C A,Shobe W,Burtraw D.An Experimental Study of Auctions versus Grandfathering to Assign Pollution Permits[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association,2010,8(2-3):514-525
[28] Holt C,Shobe W,Burtraw D,Palmer K,Goeree J,Myers E.Auction Design for Selling CO2 Emission Allowances under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative[R]. Available at SSRN 2459462,2007
[29] Kruger J,Pizer W A.The EU Emissions Trading Directive:Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls[R]. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper,No.04-24
[30] Larson D F,Parks P. Risks,Lessons Learned,andSecondary Markets for Greenhouse Gas Reductions[J]. World Bank Publications,1999
[31] Ljung G M,Box G E P. On a Measure of Lack of Fit in Time Series Models[J]. Biometrika,1978,65(2):297-303
[32] Lo A W,MacKinlay A C. Stock Market Prices do not Follow Random Walks:Evidence from a Simple Specification Test[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,1988,1(1):41-66
[33] Lofgren Å,Burtraw D,Wråke M,Malinovskaya A.Architecture of the EU Emissions Trading System in Phase 3 and the Distribution of Allowance Asset Values[J]. Working Papers in Economics 634,University of Gothenburg,Department of Economics,2015
[34] Lofgren Å,Burtraw D,Wråke M,Malinovskaya A.Distribution of Emissions Allowances and the Use of Auction Revenues in the European Union Emissions Trading System[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,2018,12(2):284-303
[35] Lopomo G,Marx L M,McAdams D,Murray D. Carbon Allowance Auction Design:An Assessment of Options for the United States[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,2011(5):25-43
[36] Reboredo J C,Ugando M.Downside Risks in EU Carbon and Fossil Fuel Markets[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,2015(111):17-35
[37] Wu T,Kung C C. Carbon Emissions,Technology Upgradation and Financing Risk of the Green Supply Chain Competition[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020(152):1-7
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
*本文获国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国建设现代中央银行调控制度研究”(21ZDA044)资助
{{custom_fund}}